Good governance: the G in ESG
In this final article in our short series on ESG we focus on governance. How a company is run has many and significant consequences. Poor actions or decisions can have far-reaching impacts, while positive ones can benefit performance as well as reputation.
IN A FEW WORDS
G in ESGESG meaningSustainable investingESG strategyESG criteria
6 min reading
Without good ‘G’ (governance), there will be no ‘E’ (environment) or ‘S’ (social). How a company is led will determine whether it practices and embodies ethical policies in all aspects of its management and strategic direction.
Poor governance can have serious consequences, with companies missing business opportunities or failing to take action on key risks. It can fatally undermine a company’s long-term viability. This final article in our short series on ESG investing looks at the G in ESG, meaning how well or poorly a company lives out ethical or sustainable practices.
Every corporate scandal is at its heart a management failure
From Volkwagen’s emissions tests to Facebook’s data misuse, to the global banking crisis – had the chairman, chief executive and board been doing their jobs correctly, the majority of these failures would not have happened. Corporate governance rules aim to create checks and balances to ensure that power is shared effectively within an organisation and the management team is held to account.
Today, most countries have their own corporate governance code, which sets out expected standards of good practice. The first iteration of the UK Corporate Governance Code was published by the Cadbury Committee in 1992 and defined corporate governance as “the system by which companies are directed and controlled”.
This Code sets the framework for good governance for UK companies. This will include how the management team is constructed – a diverse and independent board, separation of CEO and Chairman roles – so that each can hold the other accountable. Increasingly, companies see diversity as a tool in avoiding ‘group think’, which proved so damaging in cases such as Enron. It also lays out reporting rules and the internal processes and procedures that should exist – whistleblower systems, audit and risk controls, plus the right external oversight.
There is a sound investment case for good governance
Research from investment group Hermes suggests that well-governed companies perform far better than companies with weaker governance. In its report ‘ESG investing: how Covid-19 accelerated the social awakening’, it says: “Companies with good or improving corporate governance have tended to outperform companies with poor or worsening governance by 24bps per month on average”. This outperformance is unchanged over time, suggesting it is a persistent factor in share prices.
Part of this outperformance may be explained by the disastrous consequences of poor governance. S&P Global research on governance factors has shown that companies ranking below average on good governance are routinely prone to mismanagement. They may neglect key risks and try to cover them up when they emerge. If management teams score poorly on governance metrics, they are also likely to miss business opportunities and run day to day operations badly.
Governance problems are often a source of shareholder agitation. Many companies have been hit by shareholder disquiet over executive pay: JD Sports, for example, was hit by a shareholder revolt after it emerged boss Peter Cowgill was paid almost £6m in bonuses, despite the company accepting more than £100m in government support. Andrew Leslie, chair of the remuneration committee, was forced to step down after 11 years on the board.
. Sainsbury’s and WM Morrison have also run into trouble. These problems put pressure on the share price, dent a company’s reputation and are an unwelcome distraction for the executive team. There is a lingering sense that if companies are careless with shareholder funds, using them to enrich their executive team rather than directing them to staff or research and development, the company will ultimately suffer.
These governance issues may become increasingly scrutinised amid a cost of living crisis
The Investment Association, which represents UK fund managers, recently wrote to the heads of remuneration at FTSE-listed companies urging restraint on executive pay in the year ahead as many UK households struggle financially. Executive pay has bounced above pre-crisis levels. Companies that appear to be paying excessive salaries to their top team, while pushing up prices and refusing inflation-adjusted pay rises to their workers will look insensitive at best and may face continued shareholder pressure.
Shareholders are increasingly seeking to tie bonuses to environmental and social goals, putting ESG strategy at the core of the business rather than just focusing on shareholder return. There is a growing recognition that targeting shareholder return alone can skew incentives, pushing executives into short-term decision-making that flatters the share price and is not necessarily in the long-term interests of the company.
Most fund managers take governance into account, even without specific ESG criteria
There are few dedicated good governance options for investors, but it will be part of the investment selection process for the majority of investment managers even where they don’t have a specific ESG mandate. Most have been looking at this longer than they have been looking at environmental or social areas and will have clear processes in place. It’s worth looking at a fund management group’s track record on governance and the extent to which they engage with companies on areas such as executive pay.
Good governance is a key element in the long-term sustainability of a business. Badly run businesses tend to have greater risks, may miss key opportunities and lack transparency. Sustainable investing isn’t a promise of positive performance but it’s a good place to start.
Fineco Bank currently features in the FTSE4GOOD index and the S&P Global 1200 ESG index. The Fineco trading and investment platform has a broad range of tools and resources to help you work out and source investment opportunities in line with your ethical and sustainability beliefs.
Information or views expressed should not be taken as any kind of recommendation or forecast. All trading involves risks, losses can exceed deposits.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 68.01% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
Before trading CFDs, please read carefully the Key Information Documents (KIDs) available on the website finecobank.co.uk
Fineco Newsroom is a compilation of articles written by our editorial partners. Fineco is not responsible for an article's content and its accuracy nor for the information contained in the online articles linked.
These articles are provided for information only, these are not intended to be personal recommendations on financial instruments, products or financial strategies.
If you’re looking for this kind of information or support, you should seek advice from a qualified investment advisor.
Some of the articles you will find on the Newsroom feature data and information from past years. As per the very nature of the content we feature in this section of our website, some pieces of information provided might be not up to date and reliable anymore.
This advertising message is for promotional purposes only. To view all the terms and conditions for the advertised services, please refer to the fact sheets and documentation required under current regulations. All services require the client to open a Fineco current account. All products and services offered are dedicated to Fineco account.